Maybe That's Just What They Want

[ccgandrt]

In 1990, I was called a "breeder" on Castro Street, San Francisco, CA, because I am heterosexual. "Oh, no I am not!" I answered and we all got a nice chuckle out of it.
I had firmly elected never to have children when I was 17 years and never broke that commitment. Why bring a bring an innocent child into an insanely over-crowed world?
That was a fine decision for me as it all turned out.

April 18, 2007 The Supreme Court of the USA made a five to four decision that will make it harder for abortion rights advocates to challenge their new restrictions on abortions.

For an USA administration that wants to kill citizens of the world daily, it makes a lot of sense. They cannot come out as State Controlled Communist China and enforce a one child limit per couple. What about the Catholics? What about the freedoms all the USA citizens believe they have? Capitalist Leaders want to cull the weak and certain races. Capitalists leaders don't want people to have any true human rights, just the illusion of having them. A Capitalist administration is selfish and doesn't care who or how many die.

Capitalists only need their toy soldiers and their worker bees. Whether it's from botched abortions, illegal wars, torture shows or hunger; they have to keep the "breeders" under control.

[powers]

In related news, Democrats in Missouri are infuriated that a preliminary bill was slipped into a voice vote on the floor of the state senate when few members felt it was important to show up. The republican sponcered bill would reverse a 20 year restriction against mid-wives operating in the state. Current law allows only registered nurses, working with a doctor, to deliver a child in a home as a midwife.

Why democrats are against this allowing a woman to have educated help in delivering a baby in the way she wants, no one seems willing to say. Maybe the overwhelmingly affordable process of giving birth and the cheap, fair rates nurses and doctors charge are an unreported secret in this state.

If a religion can be granted the right to import a controlled substance, distribute it, and use it according to the Supreme Court, why are state and national branches of government allowing only one highly controlled and expensive process to doing something natural.

When will women start being arrested for not quitting smoking, drinking, eating poorly, or self distructivness because they deliver their child still-born? Will a child concieved in America be granted citizenship?

There are some things that government does not have the jurisdiction to legislate, an informed agreement between two competent adults is one of them.