Post by PHILIP RACUEL on Sept 21, 2006 13:41:03 GMT -5
Harry Reid says:
Democrats would conduct their own pre-election hearings on the Iraq war. To be held around the country as voters prepare to head to the polls, the sessions are intended to call attention to what Democrats say are gross missteps in the planning for the war.
FOR THE LAST TIME- THERE IS NO WAR- YET. WE INVADED AND OCCUPIED A SOVEREIGN NATION, HARRY!
GROSS MISSTEPS?...HE IS KIDDING RIGHT?
Hugo Chavez said yesterday:
(Oh I know, most people in America just heard that Chavez called Bush the "devil" but there was more to his speech then one word.)
"Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world. I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world."
Who do you think is doing a better job of telling Americans the truth about the Bush regime?
The Dems that are supposed to be our leaders in the Congress or a foreign President?
Today I look at Reid and other Dems in Congress that use benign phrases or words like - "missteps" or that d**n "war" word that is so, so incorrect.
Are the wimpy Dems hurting America more then they are helping and do we need to replace them with Dems like Ned Lamont who are more concerned with the Constitution rather then their political careers?
That is the subject of today's post- hope you all stop by and read it and add your thoughts and comments either here, on LJ or at the P&M page.
LJ link- pracuel.livejournal.com/101779.html
PM link- www.powersandmorrison.com/Blogs-MainPages/Blogs-PRacuel.html
Democrats would conduct their own pre-election hearings on the Iraq war. To be held around the country as voters prepare to head to the polls, the sessions are intended to call attention to what Democrats say are gross missteps in the planning for the war.
FOR THE LAST TIME- THERE IS NO WAR- YET. WE INVADED AND OCCUPIED A SOVEREIGN NATION, HARRY!
GROSS MISSTEPS?...HE IS KIDDING RIGHT?
Hugo Chavez said yesterday:
(Oh I know, most people in America just heard that Chavez called Bush the "devil" but there was more to his speech then one word.)
"Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner of the world. I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's statement made by the president of the United States. As the spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums, to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation and pillage of the peoples of the world."
Who do you think is doing a better job of telling Americans the truth about the Bush regime?
The Dems that are supposed to be our leaders in the Congress or a foreign President?
Today I look at Reid and other Dems in Congress that use benign phrases or words like - "missteps" or that d**n "war" word that is so, so incorrect.
Are the wimpy Dems hurting America more then they are helping and do we need to replace them with Dems like Ned Lamont who are more concerned with the Constitution rather then their political careers?
That is the subject of today's post- hope you all stop by and read it and add your thoughts and comments either here, on LJ or at the P&M page.
LJ link- pracuel.livejournal.com/101779.html
PM link- www.powersandmorrison.com/Blogs-MainPages/Blogs-PRacuel.html
